AB 1165 would prevent anyone from serving as a paid visitation monitor for children if they are convicted of a sex crime as well as other violent or serious felonies. The bill would require monitor candidates to obtain a LiveScan background check at the time of their initial employment and annually thereafter. LiveScans are currently required for teachers, childcare workers and even school volunteers. The bill clarifies that 12 of the required 24 hours of training for professional monitors must be done in-person to ensure the training has been done. AB 164 would close a loophole and help protect domestic abuse survivors by allowing California courts to enforce firearm prohibitions that are part of court orders issued in other states. Currently, California recognizes domestic violence protective orders issued by other states. However, California law does not permit a law enforcement official or court to recognize a firearm prohibition issued by another state for domestic abuse or any other violation. That leaves California officials unable to enforce a valid prohibition of the possession or purchase of a firearm issued in another state. AB 164 prevents someone from skirting a valid firearm prohibition issued in another state by crossing the state line in to California. AB 141 would require that sexually violent predators serving an indeterminate prison sentence be evaluated less than 6 months from the inmates scheduled release date. SB 22 would require that law enforcement agencies submit sexual assault forensic evidence to a crime lab for processing in a timely manner. AB 135 would make it a felony to contact a minor with the intent to engage in human trafficking. The research by the Elkins Report indicates there is a high percentage of divorce cases that could be settled without the people involved appearing before a judicial officer. Developing streamline procedures for uncontested cases and defaults could help eliminate unnecessary court appearance and reduce the cost and time commitment from the people involved in those case as well as speed up the process dramatically. The number and complexity of forms used for motions, discovery and even agreements have grown over the years often making it difficult to tell which forms are needed or even how they should be used. Frequently used forms should be reviewed to make them clear and easy to use by attorneys and by people representing themselves. These forms should also be easy to find. Finding a timely and fair resolution to marriage dissolution cases depends on factual information being presented to the courts, but many litigants feel far too often the information submitted to the courts is false. To combat this problem, the types of sanctions available to judges should be expanded for both attorneys and the parties in the case who intentionally file false statements and information. Even though other states have time standards for completion of the dissolution of marriage, California family courts do not. Rules are needed to set out a framework for timely disposition of family law cases. The Elkins Report set the following time standards as realistic goals for case completion. *Currently the average time for a marriage dissolution case in California is 11.7 months without children and 18.2 months for families with children California is an ethnically and culturally diverse state, but current mediation services are not always trained or equipped to consider the social norms from a variety of cultures and sexual orientations. Source: mediation.com For more than a decade, improvements have been recommended through independent reviews by the Judicial Council via the Elkins Family Law Task Force Final Report, as well as legislators, attorneys, judges and the very people using the system. Unfortunately, few of those recommendations have been put into practice. FJAIA is committed to keeping those needed changes in the forefront and advocating for the people who use the family law courts. 
IT’S NOW THE LAW
Professional Visitation Monitor Reform
View Recent AB-1165 Download Professional Monitor White Paper Download Pro Visitation Monitors 101 
View Recent AB-164 IT’S NOW THE LAW
No Firearms: Out-of-State Domestic Abuse Suspects (or restraining order holders)
View Recent SB-141 IT’S NOW THE LAW
Screening For Sexually Violent Predators
IT’S NOW THE LAW
Rape Kit Testing Reform
View Recent SB-22 
View Recent AB-135 Anti-Human Trafficking Legislation: No Communication With A Minor
Passed Legislation
Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 117
Key Elkins’ Recommendations for Family Law Courts
Develop Streamline Procedures for Uncontested Cases & Defaults
Simple Forms for Motions, Discovery, and Couples in Agreement
Assess and Improve Mechanisms to Handle Perjury
Set Time Standards for Divorce Completion
Provide Culturally Competent Mediation Services
The Elkins Family Law Task Force Final Reports
The Elkins Family Law Task Force Final Reports
For more than a decade, improvements have been recommended through independent reviews by the Judicial Council via the Elkins Family Law Task Force Final Report, as well as legislators, attorneys, judges and the very people using the system. Unfortunately, few of those recommendations have been put into practice. FJAIA is committed to keeping those needed changes in the forefront and advocating for the people who use the family law courts.